








Directions Use 1:1 to replace sugar in recipes. No change in baking time or temperature. Review: Five Stars - Love this, has no nasty fillers in it. Does not have the nasty after taste like stevia. Highly recommend. Review: Five Stars - Excellent alternative to Splenda granules. Very compact to take when travelling.





| ASIN | B002MO765O |
| Best Sellers Rank | 347,496 in Grocery ( See Top 100 in Grocery ) 1,452 in Sugar Substitutes |
| Brand | EZ-Sweetz |
| Brand Name | EZ-Sweetz |
| Container Type | Bottle |
| Cuisine | American cuisine |
| Customer Reviews | 4.5 out of 5 stars 1,037 Reviews |
| Item Form | Liquid |
| Item Package Weight | 0.11 Kilograms |
| Item Weight | 3.5 Ounces |
| Item form | Liquid |
| Item weight | 3.5 Ounces |
| Number of Pieces | 800 |
| Package information | Bottle |
| Package weight | 0.11 Kilograms |
| UPC | 852837003019 |
| Unit Count | 59.15 millilitre |
| Unit count | 59.15 millilitre |
A**L
Five Stars
Love this, has no nasty fillers in it. Does not have the nasty after taste like stevia. Highly recommend.
A**.
Five Stars
Excellent alternative to Splenda granules. Very compact to take when travelling.
M**A
Five Stars
Arrived promptly and as described.
B**P
OK in tea, not good in coffee. Preferable to powdered Splenda for blood glucose levels, but not to Splenda tablets
This is okay in tea, and revolting in coffee. The reason is that it leaves a slight metallic after taste. This combines adequately with tea (English Breakfast in particular) but just doesn't work with coffee, which becomes very bitter. In tea, it leaves a sort of honeyed/metal aftertaste which is rather sickly and cloying. Interestingly, Splenda (which contains sucralose as a sweetener too) doesn't do this to coffee or tea, the taste is clean and so is the aftertaste. However the big advantage of this over Splenda, in particular the powdered kind, is that it does not contain any carbohydrates and is thus less likely to raise blood sugar. We are lucky in Europe to be able to get the tablet form of Splenda, the bulk of which is made of lactose and which only contains 0.2g of carbs per pill. By contrast, as teaspoon of the powdered form of Splenda, the bulk of which is maltodextrin (a carbohydrate) contains 2g of carbs and it's the only form available in the US (apart from the liquid stuff). If you use two teaspoons in your coffee that's almost the carb equivalent of 1 teaspoon of sugar, so not such a great bargain! So if you're on a low carb diet or are just watching your blood sugar like me, it is worth replacing the powdered form of Splenda with this liquid as you'll be saving 2g of carbs per teaspoon. It's much less clear that it's worth it for the tablet form as there is a significant difference in taste and aftertaste with the liquid form, which borders on the nasty side. Splenda tastes much more like sugar. UPDATE AFTER THREE DAYS: I'm sticking to the Splenda tablets, I just don't like the aftertaste of the liquid sucralose. But now I'm avoiding the powdered kind, if I want to sweeten yogurt I just crush a tablet in a little bit of milk.
T**A
not good for me
This was a waste of money for me. One try of EZ-Sweetz and I knew I could never include it in my diet. I do a LCHF diet. I made an ice cream with full fat yoghurt, double cream and blueberries, sweetened it with EZSweetz, tried it, and had to throw it all away. It's just me no doubt, but it had an overwhelming metal taste that left me feeling strange for the rest of the day. To be fair to EZSweetz, I haven't found any sweetener that I can tolerate, but I was hoping EZSweetz would be a superior product - but it's no good for me. Only reason I gave one star rating was because no stars wasn' possible
Trustpilot
4 days ago
5 days ago