Amazon Brand - find. Men's Cotton Stretch Trunks, Pack of 5/Pack of 7/Pack of 10

I very much liked these underpants, but they're out of stock. I find this to be most frustrating as they are my best underpants. I hope the manufacters see this and stock up with more of the same.

I was swayed by all the good reviews for these and decided to give them a try.My other half seems to like them very much and has worn them for days on the trot now (that or I'm spending my life with a man who has been wearing the same actual pair of pants for days, which might be possible I suppose)They have a good amount of elasticity and seem to give 'the Bradford tickler' and company a comfortable and supportive place to 'hang' out, he says.Hoping they'll wash well and if they do I'll order some more when he needs pants again, would love some more colours to choose from.Other notes if anyone finds them helpful, for sizing etc:- he's a 40" waist, and he doesn't like his pants to be too tight. A 2xl in these is a very good fit for him but i think they would also fit a waist size or two bigger- usually I get his boxers from river island or ASOS (in a 2xl) so that's what he will be comparing these to

After attempting to order some CK boxer shorts on Amazon via a 3rd party merchant only to find out they didn't ever actually have any and pretended they had been delivered to my home adddress - I gave up and looked for an alternative. Amazon immediately refunded my payment as they have great customer service and soon realised I wasn't they only one that had been duped.I wasn't aware but Amazon have a find. range of clothing so I read the reviews and ordered a pack of 7 stretch cotton trunks to replace my ageing and fading CK's. Well I'm wearing a pair of the new boxers/trunks as I type this review and have to report they do fit as they should - I'm a 36" waist and chose the large size. The material is thinner than my previous choice but that's ok as they should help me keep cool and the legs are a bit shorter as is the waistband.They are comfortable to a point, dont rise as high at the back on your bottom as CK's but the label is a bit of an issue and I could feel it rubbing so took the scissors to it and cut it out. Why can't the labels be the same as the ones Under Armour use and be tear off?After a full days wear I can report they will do for now as a replacement - not quite a good but no way near as expensive. Not a bad first try from Amazon in my opinion, 4 out of 5 stars - losing a star for the label and possibly the fact I don't like change and they weren't exactly the same as CK's!

The elastic should be a little wider and of better quality as it feels it would start to tear after a few washes. Otherwise not a bad quality, and better then the HM ones, But HM ones have a better elastic...

Well cut and neat stitching.Initially very pleased, however...After about a year the elasticity in the fabric reduced and they became quite baggy so are now cleaning clothes for the bike.M & S bought at the same time are still fitting well.

Exactly as described, nice fit and does not constrain or cause sweating. Great bargain too, one of amazon basics better products

Very nice

Decent for the price, but I don't expect them to last long as the general feel of them feels a little cheap.I've tried the subscription undercrackers, which naturally, feel quality, but these are some way off.