Full description not available
T**I
Good text and field reference
This was my textbook for an upper division course I took on the Physics of the Earth and Planets. I liked how the author integrated the qualitative and the quantitative to make the material easily comprehendible. Used as a reference for field labs conducting geophysical surveys (including field gravity, magnetic, and seismic surveys) and a range computational laboratory exercises all requiring written reports. The book helps build a base understanding that then enables you to find your own words to communicate the data and results of the surveys and exercises. Best geophysics textbook I have encountered.
A**I
Nice book
This book is very useful
S**D
A very good intermediate level book
I consider this book a very useful reference. It does not point to advanced and still unresolved issues as a book as "Physics of the Earth" by Stacey and Davis does (which I consider advanced) but that is not its goal. The topics are covered extensively and in an accessible manner. Details left out from derivations can be found in the accompanying "Student's Guide to Geophysical Equation". I used the two together and the couple is a good standalone tool to study geophysics.
T**.
Five Stars
nice book
G**R
Works, but not the Best
Hard to read, as if it were written by someone who speaks math, not English. There are much better geophysical texts out there.
V**O
Completely unreliable!!!!
I tried to use this book as an "updated" textbook for an introductory course on Physics of the Earth (second year geophysics major) I had to taught. Since my area of research is paleomagnetism and rock magnetism the name of William Lowrie was sort of a guarantee that the book would be good. However, in the middle of the term I had to switch back to the "great classics", namely Stacey's and Garland's books. There are several problems with this book, firstly most of the formulae are presented out of the blues without a comprehensive deduction. That is not the most serious problem though, I also found several mistakes in the 2000 edition (I do not know if further editions took care of these problems). Some of these mistakes are pretty serious. As an example: he states that the international formula for the gravity normal to the Earth's ellipsoid derives directly from MacCullah's formula. That is not correct since in MacCullah's formula the centrifugal term coming from Earth's rotation is not considered!!!! There are also lots of minor mistakes related to missing terms in several formulae and derivatives. I did not touch the chapters related to geomagnetism and rock magnetism but I gather they should be the best in the whole book (I really hope so!!!!) since that is precisely William Lowrie's field of research. However I would not recommend this book at all.
H**A
Let's be sincere
This book is what its title says "FUNDAMENTALS", I think it's a pre-basic book about Geophysics. There are other books better than this one, i.e. Telford's "Applied Geophysics" and Garland's "Introduction to Geophysics" (this is what Mr. Lowrie says).
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
2 weeks ago