Thinking Through Confucius (SUNY Series in Systematic Philosophy) Paperback – October 15, 1987

I read this book and couldn't understand a damn thing they are talking about. I'm sorry to say, I got nothing from it. I read the whole thing and by the end, I still had no idea what Ames and Hall are trying to say.Not sure if the book pushed the limits of my reading comprehension or if it was just a lot of literary bells and whistles passing for some kind of deep analysis. Either way, if you plan to read this book, you ought to have a good english dictionary on hand as you'll likely be referring to it often. A Ph.D in philosophy may also help, as this book is definately not for general audiences. Best of luck to ya if you do make a purchase . . . I'd be happy to hear anyone's translation of the book into more straightforward language.

In 1987, before I took my Asian religions class at Eureka College, Marcus Ford suggested I read Thinking through Confucius. It was in many ways a powerful intellectual awakening for me and it presented Confucius as an authoritative person who could create value through ritual. There are numerous philological and philosophical debates that punctuate this work, but for me at the time, it illuminated a way of approaching philosophy from an immanent pole of reflection as opposed to the transcendent perspective offered by Plato. It was very engaging and complimented the works of Whitehead, Dewey, and James of which my professor was so fond.The book was an effort to build a bridge between Anglo-American philosophy and the Confucian tradition of thought. The authors expressed an appropriate amount of skepticism about the likelihood that they would be successful in this endeavor, but their effort and rigor set the foundation for some interesting cultural exchanges if there would be any takers. Twenty years later I would have the privilege to study under Roger Ames at a National Endowment for the Humanities workshop on China. He had written several more books and his earlier concept of authoritative personhood had evolved into the concept of the consummate person. He and Henry Rosemont (David Hall had recently passed) had begun an endeavor to explore role ethics with the Chinese tradition as an inspiration for their efforts. I should note Roger embodied many of the Confucian virtues he had written about and he was an exemplary host and teacher.The journey through Thinking through Confucius was valuable to me, and I think others who are interested in Chinese and Western philosophy will find it to be similarly rewarding. There is much that the attentive reader will be able to mine for academic reflection, and its surface will be engaging for a young philosophy student not yet entangled in the need to argue with every sentence.

"He who possesses the supreme virtue of humanity is reluctant to speak.""The exemplary person does what he is going to say, and only then, says it.".........Take your pick !!