Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness

Interesting concept.If you are not in the US and not looking to buy stuff then there are few chapters you can skip.

(This review is of the Kindle edition) When the book first emerged in the UK it was taken up by professional politicians - seeking what Winston Churchill called "the art of the possible". What one doable thing can you execute that enables a broader/deeper social phenomenon?And the authors do it well. Clear writing, effective examples, and a gradual build towards a strong understanding of what makes societies and individuals tick, and why they make the decisions they do. I found it a good read alongside Kahneman's "Thinking, Fast and Slow" which goes more into the psychology side; Thaler and Sunstein are more practitioners. Definitely worth reading.

I've come late to this updated 'classic' popular psychology book from 2021, updating the 2008 original. If I'd read it when the first version came out, I would probably have been really positive about it. Much of what's in here sounds very sensible and effective. And all sorts of people followed the concept of 'nudging', from hotels telling us that most people reuse towels to reduce laundry costs to governments setting up 'nudge units' like the UK's Behavioural Insights Team. But the reality has proved rather different from the assertions made here.One problem is sorting out what a nudge is. According to Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, a nudge should 'alter people's behaviour in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.' Nudges should be both easy and cheap, making them 'libertarian paternalism'.There is no doubt that some nudges work, some do something but not what is claimed, some don't work at all... and many never were nudges in the first place.A classic pre-nudge nudge is painting broken white lines down the middle of the road. There is good evidence that this improved road safety in classic nudge fashion. Probably the poster child of nudge, opt-out organ donation fits in the second category. There is no doubt that it did increase sign up - but it didn't increase organ donation significantly because there wasn't the foundation of a good supply and match ability to back up those extra sign-ups. Thaler and Sunstein acknowledge the need to go beyond the nudge, here but fail to admit that this underlines the power of nudging in isolation is often limited.A wonderful example of the 'never worked' type is the idea of having a rewards system to encourage recycling. We are told that 'in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, a London suburb' (I suspect the residents of Windsor and Maidenhead would have something to say about this description) recycling increased by 35% as a result of a reward scheme. But clearly the authors never followed this up, as it was abandoned years ago and academic reviews of these schemes found their effectiveness doubtful.As for the 'not a nudge in the first place' category, quite of few of the examples given here are not nudges by the authors' own definition. For example a scheme they describe did result in a reduction of littering in Texas - but we are not told that this 'nudge' included an up-to-$2,000 fine, and a program of volunteer litter pick up days. The way the use of nudges is described, it appears that something is a nudge if it works and not if it doesn't.Making things worse is the replication crisis in psychology and other soft sciences, which has rendered much the original research in this kind of field of doubtful value. The updated version of the book, despite coming well after the realisation than many social sciences studies were underpowered or had manipulated results that had little or no value, does not give us any sense of taking a step back from original assertions.I was disappointed by this book - while I used to love its ilk (for example, Leavitt and Dubner's Freakonomics), I have come to be highly suspicious of the claims made in popular social sciences books which claim to give amazing and surprising insights into everyday behaviour that will change your life, your work and your government. So much for innocence of youth...

Sunstein and Thaler have created a book which shows how we can frame choices in ways to help the fallible and biased human nature make the right choice. The complexity of the different biases is well explained and the example nudges provided are all compelling arguments. Leaders in every government and company should read this book.

Most of the content of this book is covered elsewhere - ("Thinking, fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman" is a better read) but the book brings together some interesting points about nudges for behaviour change. As with most books about human behaviour, it's a question of looking for the interesting nuggets rather than expecting a solid block of fascinating material but it's worth a go. If I were to buy again I'd get the paper version not the Kindle one: the indexing doesn't make it easy to flick between sections and that's what you need to do when you're nugget-trawling.

It is such an accessible account of behavioural psychology

The concept of paternal liberalism is a concept that is a rather over simplification applied to a broad reaching set of complicated issues that is based on people trying or wanting to do the right, fair, reasonable thing. This is not realistic, and is very much written from the perspective of the authors, both academics, who it appears are isolated from the market driven, competitive, unequal world which has resulted in Brexit and Donald J Trump. Although the concept of identifying the importance of behavioural economics in policy making is made clear.

A must read for anyone and everyone - simply written and easy to grasp