Foster GrantMen's Blake PolarizedSquareReaders

The product was clearly used. It was represented to be new.

These readers are well made; well, better made than most of the others. Many readers I've purchased here on Amazon fell apart within a few weeks, months at best. These Foster Grants have loosened up, but are still holding up after almost a year. I'm hard on them, but these are the best of the bunch so far. Not easy to find your proper magnification number (mine's 2.75 - and this is close to my last pair of prescription glasses, while costing 1/10th what they did), but once you figure that out - these Foster Grants are the way to go.

These will last longer

I generally like Foster Grant glasses but these are my least favorite. The nose bridge attaches to each lens and protrudes too far into the optical path. It seem like there is always "something on my lens" when my eye is seeing the metal bridge. Reminds me of the eyeglass grabber from Steve Martins the Jerk.

These are nice glasses but they do not last long due to being frameless glasses.

The glasses arrived ahead of schedule. The price was reasonable. They are comfortable and the images are sharp. These glasses are easy to clean.I already had a pair of Foster Grant's for almost 2 years of heavy and rough usage, but the frame finally broke. I was hoping to find the exact same model but was unable to do so. These are very close to what I had before and I am very satisfied with them.

why are the 1.5 more than the 1.25 ? like very much. best buy for the money. buying more . go to sleep on them and they still fit, women like the frame and no rim so it's also slimming for you if new to reader'sI'm a man and they are great.they seem to walk, if you know what I mean.was disappointed no case to store them .

I bought a pair of these at CVS pharmacy for a few dollars more and needed to replace them. I bought the same model number from Amazon and the pair from Amazon are not the quality of the ones I purchased from CVS. The reason I suspect they are counterfeit is because of the following:1) Different font on the silk screen numbers;2) the focus is not sharp to the edges of the lens while the ones from CVS are;3) the arm mounts are shaped differently (the ones from CVS are beefier).If they are not counterfeit, then Foster Grant has reduced the quality and are no longer worth the $25-$30.

Un poco estrecho el puente que va sobre la nariz. Todo lo demás excelente. Si tienes nariz respingada te quedará perfecto.

not as advertised

Muy buenos lentes me encantaron su material se ve muy bien y resistente, solo falta cambiar micas para mi graduación.

Fue un excelente servicio, con un seguimiento muy preciso y exacto; eso me gustó muchísimo. Sigan así con esa eficiencia.