Tru-SpecTru-Spec Men's 24-7 Series Original Tactical Pant - EDC, Hiking, Camping, and Tactical Use - 65/35 Polyester/Cotton Rip-Stop

No me canso de recomendar estos pantalones, son cómodos y de muy buena calidad, yo intento comprarlos cuando tienen algún descuento por mi economía ya que no son baratos pero la verdad valen la pena.Entregados en tiempo y forma, muy satisfecho.

Habe Größe XL bestellt, entspricht aber eher 5XL, die Hose entspricht nichtmal ansatzweise der europäischen Größenangabe.Diese Hose kann man tragen wenn man 200 KG + wiegt, die Bundweite war größer als ein Tisch mit 70 cm Kantenlänge. Ich bräuchte hier wohl Größe S damit sie passen würde, trage sonst XL.

Regarding these not being true to size (see critical review): This has not been my experience at all. I'm not going to go on and on about my other pants. I trust that you will believe that I have been successful in buying myself other types of pants that have fit. These Tru Specs posed no unusual challenges for me. I run 32x32 in looser fitting, relaxed jeans, and its the same deal with these. I almost think MP06011999 who says they "run really small" must have gotten a mislabeled pair. I know it seems unlikely, but I have 7 pairs of these, and they all fit the same as my jeans. Additionally these pants have an elastic band in the waist, allowing for one to CCW a full sized, IWB, and comfortably gain and lose 10 or more pounds without changing sizes. I know because I CCW full sized, and have been injured twice in the past two years, which prevented me from lifting weights and caused my body weight fluctuations. Wore the Tru Specs throughout the weight changes regardless of whether I carried IWB, or OWB (winter months, camping, hiking, etc.) The reason I have so many pairs is simply because I think they're outstanding in every way. They are very durable, they don't look "tactical," (more like standard cargo pants, especially in khaki or coyote coloring) they have tons of pockets, they look good, and they dry reasonably quickly, being 65% ply 35% cotton. That's important if your outdoorsy. The cotton ensures they are still very comfortable. The Teflon coating will make rain bead off, and keep them from staining for quite awhile, but honestly I've never cared either way for that feature, and after enough wash/dry cycles that aspect will fade. Another reason I have so many pairs because I like the idea of having everything I carry in the same pockets every single day, especially when I had backup mags in pockets. I have a place for everything from my knife to E-Cigararette, and they're always right where I expect them to be, regardless of what (color) pants I am wearing. They're reasonably priced enough to give a pair a shot, I think you'll be glad you did.

I've had my brown pair of these pants for almost a year now, which is hard to imagine, because they look brand new still. I don't have an intense job, I'm not a military contractor or anything like that, I just like to wear tough, durable, and most importantly comfortable pants. For years I've just bought Walmart cargo pants and worn them until they fell apart...which typically takes six months or so at the most. Since I finally have a little more cash in my pockets I decided I'd try something a bit more pricey and after much debating between stuff like 5.11 and Blackhawk brand and the like I figured I'd try Tru-Spec because they were a little cheaper priced. I bought these and also Riggs Workwear ranger pants by Wrangler. The Riggs are still in the condition I bought them in too...because I've only worn them a few times and now they collect dust in my closet. They are so heavy and unyielding they just didn't work for me. The Tru-Spec on the other hand I wear atleast once a week because, simply put, they are awesome. They have a plethora of pockets, like cargo pants, but are cut more like nice dress pants. The cargo pockets don't bulge and sag, which adds to the more stylish look, in my humble opinion. Most wonderfully, the waist has an elastic part to them, also like nice dress pants, that allows them to give a little. This was my gripe with the Riggs; they crushed my waist and dug into me all day. The Tru-Spec I bought (and the 5.11 pants I'm wearing right now) have waists that move and flex with you and are more forgiving if you seem to be between pants sizes (I think I must be a 33 on some days and a 32 on others...try finding 33s). Also, and this is a big one, they seem to be true to my size or at least close. I tend to wear a 32 so I bought these in that size. The 32x32s were a little long on me, though most 32 length pants are so I wasn't surprised. My second pair I bought in coyote were 32x30s and they were a little shorter than I like, but who makes 31s? Oh, well. The short of it is that I'm happy with these. I have since bought 5.11 and Vertx both of which ran small (the Vertx ran EXTREMELY small in the waist, I couldn't even zip them up and the 32x32 5.11 wore like 32x34 or 36s...I mean crazy long) and had to replace. I'm fairly happy with my the 32x30 5.11 pants I bought, but to me their pocket placement seems inferior to the Tru-Spec pocket placement. Between the 5.11 and the Tru-Spec the material seems about the same, but the 5.11 are a bit more expensive. I'm keeping my 5.11 and wearing them in my normal rotation, but I bought another pair of Tru-Spec and will probably buy more in the future as my go to work pants. Overall I don't know how long-term wear and tear in the field would work out, but I feel like the material would be tough enough I wouldn't worry about them giving out while I was hunting or hiking, though I usually reserve cheap and comfy combat pants for such roles, simple because I can buy them all day for around $10 at the military surplus store and not have a heart attack if I rip a hole in them. I give Tru-Spec pants a rare 5 stars for all the reasons listed. Give them a try and I don't think you'll be disappointed.

I know I'm gonna get dinged here for this, but I feel obliged to warn others. These run VERY SMALL.Every single pair of pants that I have purchased and currently own are 36 x 30 except for one 38 x 30 pair I keep for wearing long underwear under. So, it would go to figure, by many of the comments I read, that 36 x 30 in these would be perfect. If they ran a little tight the slider waistband would surely accommodate. NOPE! They are way too small.My wife, who always inherits my pants I can no longer fit in can't even wear them. While they "can" fit in the waist, they are definitely made for more like a 32 inch waist as they are way too tight in the hips, pulling on the pockets. Again, ALL the pants (12 pair) that I have been wearing and purchasing from many different makers for 6+ years now are all 36 x 30 and fit a tad big. These, I can't even wear. So be warned, they run SUPER SMALL.Also, I messed up by not trying them on before washing them. I took all the tags off. Washed them in cold. Low heat dried them and then went to put them on only to discover the fit problem. Handed them to the wife to try, same thing - way too tight in the hips. Yes, it is my fault that I am now stuck with a pair of pants I paid $31 for. But it is not my fault that they are this far out of typical sizing. They look well constructed, but are not wearable. While many may think 2 stars is mean for a mere size issue, I can't give 3 stars indicating they are "okay" because they are not. If I order something blue and it arrives green, that makes it "not okay". And if I gave it 3 stars not only would that be incorrect, but it would do nothing to alert others to the sizing issue.And for those childish enough to vote this review "not helpful" because they don't like me dinging a well praised item realize that this IS helpful. I wish I had read a review like this and then I would have known to order two sizes larger than every other pair of pants I have. And look at all my other reviews. I write a lot of detailed honest reviews trying to help others. The only reason I'm writing this one. I'm neither a fan boy nor a hater.