---
product_id: 1171966
title: "Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera"
brand: "sigma"
price: "€ 1520.66"
currency: EUR
in_stock: false
reviews_count: 8
category: "Sigma"
url: https://www.desertcart.com.cy/products/1171966-sigma-70-200mm-f-2-8-apo-ex-dg-hsm
store_origin: CY
region: Cyprus
---

# f/2.8 constant wide aperture 70-200mm versatile zoom 4-stop Optical Stabilizer Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera

**Brand:** sigma
**Price:** € 1520.66
**Availability:** ❌ Out of Stock

## Summary

> 📸 Elevate your vision with Sigma’s sharpest telephoto zoom—because every shot deserves perfection.

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera by sigma
- **How much does it cost?** € 1520.66 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Currently out of stock
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.com.cy](https://www.desertcart.com.cy/products/1171966-sigma-70-200mm-f-2-8-apo-ex-dg-hsm)

## Best For

- sigma enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted sigma brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Key Features

- • **Pro-Level Zoom Range:** Capture everything from intimate portraits to distant details with the flexible 70-200mm focal length.
- • **Bright f/2.8 Aperture:** Shoot confidently in low light and create stunning background blur that makes your subject pop.
- • **Silent & Fast Autofocus:** Ring-type ultrasonic motor delivers whisper-quiet, precise focus locking for professional-grade results.
- • **Built to Last & Travel Ready:** Robust construction with 77mm filter compatibility, weighing just 3.2 lbs—your ultimate event companion.
- • **Rock-Solid Image Stabilization:** 4-stop OS ensures razor-sharp shots even handheld at slower shutter speeds—never miss the moment.

## Overview

The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD is a professional-grade telephoto zoom lens designed for Nikon DSLRs, featuring a versatile 70-200mm focal range, a bright constant f/2.8 aperture for low-light performance, and a 4-stop optical stabilizer for steady handheld shooting. Its fast, silent ultrasonic autofocus motor ensures precise focus, while durable build quality and compatibility with 77mm filters make it ideal for event, portrait, and outdoor photography. Highly rated for sharpness and reliability, this lens is a favorite among wedding and professional photographers seeking premium image quality without compromise.

## Description

SIGMA 70-200MM LENS NIKON F/2.8 LRG TELEPHOTO

Review: Best lens I ever owned - I came from owning the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 and looking for something better since I do weddings and other events. The Tamron was unusable at f2.8 plus extreme corner unsharpness and lots of chromatic aberration. I was a little bit anxious if the Sigma OS might not be much better. Wrong! This lens is incredibly sharp. Even at f2.8. Even at 200mm. Impressive! - How sharp is it? - At f2.8 it is already very sharp, at any focal length. Viewing the resulting photos in the usual web resolution (up to 900px) you can not see any unsharpness at all. On a 100% view it's getting a little bit softer, but the sharpness is still on par with any (medium-tele to tele, can't compare wide-angles) Nikon glass I have ever shot with wide-open (and that includes e.g. the 50mm f1.4G and 105mm f2.0). Maybe I have the best copy ever produced by Sigma - but what I'm saying is that none of the six prime lenses I ever owned was sharper wide-open. If you stop it down a little bit to f4.0 it gets incredible sharp to a point that results are just limited by my camera sensor's resolution (using it on D300 and now on D700). Corner sharpness: Towards the corners it's getting a little bit softer (affecting roughly the outer 25-30% of the image) but compared to my Sigma & Tamron 17-50mm (which is not a fair comparison though) it is quite acceptable. The corner unsharpness gets more significant the more you zoom in. And on a full frame sensor you will have more corner unsharpness than on a cropped sensor. For most uses of this lens the corner sharpness it not extremely significant. I didn't even notice the unsharpness until using this lens (on D700) for some group pictures at a wedding lately. I guess a prime (if handy) would be my better choice next time but the photos still came out great and the slight unsharpness on the few group pics where people where in the outer lens area are only visible on 1:1 or maybe 1:2 view. - What about the focus? - Quiet. Reasonably fast. Accurate and locks without hunting. Having owned more than a dozen AF lenses in my life, I could not name you one that had a significantly better focus than the Sigma. - Is the optical stabilizer (OS) worth the higher price tag? - A b s o l u t e l y . And when you had the Sigma 70-200 without OS in mind: Sigma redesigned and improved the whole thing. (Google for "dpreview sigma 70-200 OS") It's not just about the OS. But even if, the OS alone is worth every cent. When you press the shutter halfway the picture starts to "glue". I can take pictures with this lens at 200mm down to 1/50 second without blur, could even do some with 1/30 at 200mm (still need a calm hand for that though). For pictures at around 1/200 it significantly helps too to get a much higher keeper rate. - What are the OS settings? - You can switch to: OFF - you should do that for tripod use, otherwise the OS will produce blur 1 - for panning pictures like moving car and cam is following the car 2 - for all other OS use (much more efficient than 1) - Using it for portraits rather than a prime now - I also have the Sigma 85mm f1.4 which makes fantastic pictures but I started to leaving it home and using the 70-200 now for outdoor portrait work like engagement photos. The classic arguments for primes are that they are sharper and faster (wider aperture). I don't see the 85mm at f2.5 being visibly sharper than the 70-200 at f4 (about the very corner sharpness I don't care too much for portrait work either). And for the bokeh, I get more of that at f4 @ 150mm than at f2.5 @ 85mm (I wouldn't use any long lens totally wide open in bright, sunny environment). And about the my-feet-are-my-zoom strategy I just gotta say: the more you zoom in, the more the background gets compressed and the closer it gets. So with a long tele-zoom lens you can adjust your focal length to include more or less of the background and getting background objects closer to your subject (e.g. people standing in front of the Golden Gate Bridge). And that's an important thing to do for your picture composition. You cannot do that with your feet and a prime. So I would say this lens is not only a great choice for doing event and wedding photography, but also for portrait work. It is not cheap but it might be the last lens you ever needed (if you are all-set on wide-angles that is). - Conclusion - I might end up some day with the Nikon 70-200 f2.8 and keeping the Sigma as a backup (I don't think I will ever sell this beauty!), but no hurry for that: The Sigma is such an amazing lens that I don't feel the urge to step up at the moment. I can just highly recommend it to anyone. It is truly the best lens I ever owned. UPDATE 6/25/2012: Still the best lens I ever owned. Done more than a dozen paid shoots with it including a couple of weddings. The keeper rate of this lens is amazing. I'd say less than 5% of shots taken with it needed to be deleted because of unsharpness etc (the OS is doing such an incredible job). And that includes low light wedding receptions. The lens is exclusively on my D700 and this combination rocks. Wide enough on the 70mm end e.g. for a bride walking down the aisle. If the locations supports it I'm doing all wedding formals (group/family shots) with it too, because the corner unsharpness is very low and better than most other lenses that I carry around with me. For some casual engagement/portrait sessions I took out the Sigma 85 f1.4 instead and loved the creaminess of the bokeh which beats the Sigma 70-200 on an artistic level, while I would still kind of prefer the 70-200 for its zoom-capability (and it also has a nice bokeh, but in a bokeh-contest the 70-200 will lose after a hard decision). I'm protecting it with an Hoya HMC 77mm UV filter, btw - and you should do the same. Don't go with a cheaper filter as it will produce likely ghost reflections, the Hoya never did that to me and the ~$40 investment is a wise choice to protect your multi-coated front element. Anyhow, I hope that your copy of this lens will be as great as mine, maybe I was just lucky. I bought it used on desertcart. UPDATE 12/18/2013: Slightly unrelated, but maybe still interesting for potential buyers: After switching my entire gear from Nikon to Canon, I bought the exact same lens for the Canon mount. Same great results. Love this lens. I would say it is 90% of the quality the Canon 70-200 IS II. Several 2nd shooters working for me at weddings brought their $2k Canon lens and the results weren't better than mine with this Sigma. Conclusion: I will stay with the Sigma 70-200 for a longer time and rather update other lenses first (if I ever need to buy the more expensive 70-200).
Review: Great zoom lens - wonderful for wedding photographers! - This is truly a wonderful camera lens. The 70-200 zoom range is great - I use this primarily when shooting wedding ceremonies. It is also nice on vacation for getting shots of things a little further away, or photographing birds at home. A 400 zoom range would be better, but you lose some aperture abilities there, and I need to be able to shoot in low light. It was tough deciding between this and the longer length, but this ultimately won out because I needed the low light capabilities. Inside of a church, this works great (and outside, of course, it is outstanding). There are two oddities: the zoom is the reverse of every other zoom I own (or have owned). Isn't that odd? I ALWAYS have to think about which way to turn this to zoom - and sometimes that extra second can cause me to miss the shot. Also, if you take the lens hood off and attach it to the lens, you can no longer use the zoom - another oddity! If I ever do take it off, I end up wearing it on my arm like some odd piece of jewelry until I have a chance to get back to my camera bag and stash it. I find the focus is accurate and fast - which I can't say about my Sigma 35mm prime (I despise that thing and that lens almost made me not order this one). But this one has a great focus. It is a heavy lens, and your arms will feel it after an 8-10 hour wedding day, but it takes beautiful photos. I like this also during the reception because I can be further away and still get great shots. I highly recommend this! It is a reasonable price for a nice piece of glass that should last a very long time.

## Features

- 70-200mm focal length, Minimum Focusing Distance :140cm / 55.1inch, Maximum Magnification -1:8.FOCAL LENGTH SIMULATOR:The focal length changes the angle of view in an image. The longer the focal length, the smaller the angle of view and the greater the magnification
- 105-300mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, 112-320mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras.SIGMA DC lenses cannot be used with digital cameras with an image sensor larger than APS-C size or 35mm SLR, and APS Film SLR cameras.
- F2.8 constant maximum aperture; F22 minimum, Ring-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing
- Image stabilization, 4 stops claimed. Dual mode, normal and panning, 77mm filters
- Available in Canon EF, Nikon F (FX), Pentax KAF3, Sony Alpha, Sigma SA mounts. Dimensions (DxL) Approx. 3.4 x 7.8" (8.64 x 19.81 cm), Weight 3.15 lb (1.43 kg).

## Technical Specifications

| Specification | Value |
|---------------|-------|
| ASIN | B003HC8VA4 |
| Batteries | 1 9V batteries required. |
| Best Sellers Rank | #1,939 in Camera Lenses |
| Customer Reviews | 4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars (945) |
| Date First Available | February 1, 2010 |
| Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
| Item Weight | 3.2 pounds |
| Item model number | 589306 |
| Manufacturer | Sigma Corporation of America |
| Product Dimensions | 7.76 x 3.39 x 3.39 inches |

## Product Details

- **Brand:** Sigma
- **Compatible Mountings:** Nikon F (FX)
- **Focal Length Description:** Telephoto
- **Lens Type:** Telephoto

## Images

![Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61ccyjedtiL.jpg)
![Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera - Image 2](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61VNUeZGBGL.jpg)
![Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera - Image 3](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/312f0znfR6L.jpg)
![Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera - Image 4](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71V7eI9ZNrL.jpg)

## Available Options

This product comes in different **Style** options.

## Questions & Answers

**Q: Will this lens work on a Nikon D3000?  Thx**
A: I'm certain it will; it works on all of our DX and FX cameras (D3200, D300S, D800). However with your D3000, as with all Nikon DX cameras, it will have the 1.5X factor in angles of view. Pretty heavy for handheld shots though, I highly recommend a tripod with it, this what I do most of the time with this lens; the plus side is that it's also a fast lens, so perhaps you can go to faster shutter speeds to reduce camera-weight related shakes.

**Q: Is this a USA lens, with Sigma's 3 year USA extended warranty, or is it a "grey market" item?**
A: Sigma is a renowned lens manufacturer, this lens is probably one of their top of the range Zoom lenses. I bought mine in South Africa and it did come with a 3 year warranty for South Africa. It should be the same for you cause Sigma has operations in the USA.

**Q: I was looking at the canon 70-200 f/2.8 for $2,000.  i am not a pro.  would this lens be better for me.  i have a canon sl1. thanks**
A: The Tamron 70-200 is comparable in quality to the Canon 70-200, and much more affordable.

**Q: will this work with a canon t3i**
A: Yes, the Canon mount of this Sigma lens, will work with any Rebel/T-series, 50d, 60d, 7d, 70d, and all full frame dslr bodies (5D, 5D Mark II, 5D Mark III, etc).Keep in mind that on your T3i body (aps/cropped sensor) the focal range will be approximately 112mm-320mm due to the 1.6 crop factor of the smaller sensor.

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Best lens I ever owned
*by P***. on March 30, 2012*

I came from owning the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 and looking for something better since I do weddings and other events. The Tamron was unusable at f2.8 plus extreme corner unsharpness and lots of chromatic aberration. I was a little bit anxious if the Sigma OS might not be much better. Wrong! This lens is incredibly sharp. Even at f2.8. Even at 200mm. Impressive! - How sharp is it? - At f2.8 it is already very sharp, at any focal length. Viewing the resulting photos in the usual web resolution (up to 900px) you can not see any unsharpness at all. On a 100% view it's getting a little bit softer, but the sharpness is still on par with any (medium-tele to tele, can't compare wide-angles) Nikon glass I have ever shot with wide-open (and that includes e.g. the 50mm f1.4G and 105mm f2.0). Maybe I have the best copy ever produced by Sigma - but what I'm saying is that none of the six prime lenses I ever owned was sharper wide-open. If you stop it down a little bit to f4.0 it gets incredible sharp to a point that results are just limited by my camera sensor's resolution (using it on D300 and now on D700). Corner sharpness: Towards the corners it's getting a little bit softer (affecting roughly the outer 25-30% of the image) but compared to my Sigma & Tamron 17-50mm (which is not a fair comparison though) it is quite acceptable. The corner unsharpness gets more significant the more you zoom in. And on a full frame sensor you will have more corner unsharpness than on a cropped sensor. For most uses of this lens the corner sharpness it not extremely significant. I didn't even notice the unsharpness until using this lens (on D700) for some group pictures at a wedding lately. I guess a prime (if handy) would be my better choice next time but the photos still came out great and the slight unsharpness on the few group pics where people where in the outer lens area are only visible on 1:1 or maybe 1:2 view. - What about the focus? - Quiet. Reasonably fast. Accurate and locks without hunting. Having owned more than a dozen AF lenses in my life, I could not name you one that had a significantly better focus than the Sigma. - Is the optical stabilizer (OS) worth the higher price tag? - A b s o l u t e l y . And when you had the Sigma 70-200 without OS in mind: Sigma redesigned and improved the whole thing. (Google for "dpreview sigma 70-200 OS") It's not just about the OS. But even if, the OS alone is worth every cent. When you press the shutter halfway the picture starts to "glue". I can take pictures with this lens at 200mm down to 1/50 second without blur, could even do some with 1/30 at 200mm (still need a calm hand for that though). For pictures at around 1/200 it significantly helps too to get a much higher keeper rate. - What are the OS settings? - You can switch to: OFF - you should do that for tripod use, otherwise the OS will produce blur 1 - for panning pictures like moving car and cam is following the car 2 - for all other OS use (much more efficient than 1) - Using it for portraits rather than a prime now - I also have the Sigma 85mm f1.4 which makes fantastic pictures but I started to leaving it home and using the 70-200 now for outdoor portrait work like engagement photos. The classic arguments for primes are that they are sharper and faster (wider aperture). I don't see the 85mm at f2.5 being visibly sharper than the 70-200 at f4 (about the very corner sharpness I don't care too much for portrait work either). And for the bokeh, I get more of that at f4 @ 150mm than at f2.5 @ 85mm (I wouldn't use any long lens totally wide open in bright, sunny environment). And about the my-feet-are-my-zoom strategy I just gotta say: the more you zoom in, the more the background gets compressed and the closer it gets. So with a long tele-zoom lens you can adjust your focal length to include more or less of the background and getting background objects closer to your subject (e.g. people standing in front of the Golden Gate Bridge). And that's an important thing to do for your picture composition. You cannot do that with your feet and a prime. So I would say this lens is not only a great choice for doing event and wedding photography, but also for portrait work. It is not cheap but it might be the last lens you ever needed (if you are all-set on wide-angles that is). - Conclusion - I might end up some day with the Nikon 70-200 f2.8 and keeping the Sigma as a backup (I don't think I will ever sell this beauty!), but no hurry for that: The Sigma is such an amazing lens that I don't feel the urge to step up at the moment. I can just highly recommend it to anyone. It is truly the best lens I ever owned. UPDATE 6/25/2012: Still the best lens I ever owned. Done more than a dozen paid shoots with it including a couple of weddings. The keeper rate of this lens is amazing. I'd say less than 5% of shots taken with it needed to be deleted because of unsharpness etc (the OS is doing such an incredible job). And that includes low light wedding receptions. The lens is exclusively on my D700 and this combination rocks. Wide enough on the 70mm end e.g. for a bride walking down the aisle. If the locations supports it I'm doing all wedding formals (group/family shots) with it too, because the corner unsharpness is very low and better than most other lenses that I carry around with me. For some casual engagement/portrait sessions I took out the Sigma 85 f1.4 instead and loved the creaminess of the bokeh which beats the Sigma 70-200 on an artistic level, while I would still kind of prefer the 70-200 for its zoom-capability (and it also has a nice bokeh, but in a bokeh-contest the 70-200 will lose after a hard decision). I'm protecting it with an Hoya HMC 77mm UV filter, btw - and you should do the same. Don't go with a cheaper filter as it will produce likely ghost reflections, the Hoya never did that to me and the ~$40 investment is a wise choice to protect your multi-coated front element. Anyhow, I hope that your copy of this lens will be as great as mine, maybe I was just lucky. I bought it used on Amazon. UPDATE 12/18/2013: Slightly unrelated, but maybe still interesting for potential buyers: After switching my entire gear from Nikon to Canon, I bought the exact same lens for the Canon mount. Same great results. Love this lens. I would say it is 90% of the quality the Canon 70-200 IS II. Several 2nd shooters working for me at weddings brought their $2k Canon lens and the results weren't better than mine with this Sigma. Conclusion: I will stay with the Sigma 70-200 for a longer time and rather update other lenses first (if I ever need to buy the more expensive 70-200).

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Great zoom lens - wonderful for wedding photographers!
*by L***Y on February 6, 2016*

This is truly a wonderful camera lens. The 70-200 zoom range is great - I use this primarily when shooting wedding ceremonies. It is also nice on vacation for getting shots of things a little further away, or photographing birds at home. A 400 zoom range would be better, but you lose some aperture abilities there, and I need to be able to shoot in low light. It was tough deciding between this and the longer length, but this ultimately won out because I needed the low light capabilities. Inside of a church, this works great (and outside, of course, it is outstanding). There are two oddities: the zoom is the reverse of every other zoom I own (or have owned). Isn't that odd? I ALWAYS have to think about which way to turn this to zoom - and sometimes that extra second can cause me to miss the shot. Also, if you take the lens hood off and attach it to the lens, you can no longer use the zoom - another oddity! If I ever do take it off, I end up wearing it on my arm like some odd piece of jewelry until I have a chance to get back to my camera bag and stash it. I find the focus is accurate and fast - which I can't say about my Sigma 35mm prime (I despise that thing and that lens almost made me not order this one). But this one has a great focus. It is a heavy lens, and your arms will feel it after an 8-10 hour wedding day, but it takes beautiful photos. I like this also during the reception because I can be further away and still get great shots. I highly recommend this! It is a reasonable price for a nice piece of glass that should last a very long time.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Amazing lens, too heavy for me
*by N***E on August 10, 2013*

I loved this lens, but I had to return it. Why 5 stars? Well, it's everything I hoped it to be. Incredible sharpness, fast aperture, and $1000 less than the Canon for a [reportedly] very slight decrease in quality. Why did I return it? Two reasons, it's too bulky to travel/have fun with, and I don't need f/2.8. On the first point, I'm well built @ 175lbs 6', and 28 years old. Strong enough to lug around 3.5 pounds. But for my style of photography - hanging out with friends, photographing family, fly-on-the-wall type stuff - it was just too damn big. Every time I pulled it out, I felt like Christoph Waltz in Inglorious Basterds, casually and awkwardly unsheathing out my huge pipe. I also have a bad back, and I'll be damned if 3.5 pounds at a weird backpack angle doesn't wear me out. Your mileage may vary on this point, but for me, the cost/benefit didn't make sense. On the subject of f/2.8 - I don't have kids, I don't have indoor soccer games to photograph, generally no indoor events where speed at this focal range would be useful (e.g., a house - you have to be across a large room or down a hall for 70-200 to make sense on an APS-C)... I just have no need for it. I convinced myself prior to buying this that I wanted the best, and this is certainly it. But after playing around with it for a few weeks, I realized that I don't need the f/2.8 and I don't need the weight. I ended up with the Canon 70-200 f/4L IS USM. It's a nice lens, way lighter, less conspicuous, and reportedly sharper (though I can't tell the difference). I also tried the 70-300 f/4.0 - 5.6, and it was OK, but felt too cheap. It was also noticeably less sharp when compared side-by-side with the Sigma & Canon. One last note - I ordered all of these lenses used but 'Like New' from Amazon Warehouse. The lenses I received were in almost-perfect condition, so I highly recommend exploring the "used" options from Amazon Warehouse. That said, when I finally decided on the Canon 70-200 f/4L IS USM, I bought it via Amazon Warehouse. They shipped the non-IS version to me, which is worth about half of what I paid. I calmly but firmly called Amazon, and they agreed to refund full return shipping costs, as well as overnight a brand new 70-200 f/4L IS USM to me, which I received the very next day. To be clear, I paid full price for the f/4L IS, though I saved 7% due to a running promotion - 4% off camera equipment, plus 3% cash back from the Amazon Visa. So it ended up costing the same as the used version due to the savings! But anyway, Amazon agreed to waive the overnight shipping fee on the replacement, which was awesome, so that felt pretty fair. All-in-all, if you are sure that you need f/2.8 and that 3.5 lbs isn't a big deal, then buy this thing and don't look back.

## Frequently Bought Together

- Sigma 589306 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM Optical Stabilised Telephoto Lens Nikon Fit, Black
- SanDisk 128GB Extreme PRO SDXC card + RescuePRO Deluxe, up to 200MB/s, UHS I, Class 10, U3, V30 SDSDXXD 128G GN4IN, Black
- K&F Concept 77mm MCUV Lens Protection Filter 18 Multi-Coated Camera Lens UV Filter Ultra Slim with Cleaning Cloth (K-Series)

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.com.cy/products/1171966-sigma-70-200mm-f-2-8-apo-ex-dg-hsm](https://www.desertcart.com.cy/products/1171966-sigma-70-200mm-f-2-8-apo-ex-dg-hsm)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Cyprus*
*Store origin: CY*
*Last updated: 2026-03-04*